Wednesday, 23 January 2013

A very feminist rant

Nothing has inspired more rage in me recently than this piece by the BBC. This is not necessarily going to be a particularly popular post, as most of my family and my oldest friends from home are anti-abortion, but this kind of thing makes me SO ANGRY.

Firstly, the fact that anyone thinks it is acceptable to question a stranger on their way in to a medical building is absolutely abhorrent to me. The picketing of abortion clinics is one of the most obnoxious things you can do. Whilst free speech is vital to a healthy democracy, the cost of that is taking responsibility for the impact your words have. Does anyone really think that harassing a woman outside the clinic is likely to change her mind? It is nothing other than bullying to cause shame and guilt, something that already abounds in the situation. It is not helpful, constructive or likely to result in anything other than anger. 

My main issue with the anti-abortion movement is the fact that the people who legislate against abortion also legislate against welfare and benefits. I do not think anyone can claim to be 'pro-life' who then actively attempts to prevent those deep in poverty from maintaining the most basic standard of living. To me, it would seem obvious that if you want a woman to become a mother rather than have a termination then ensuring financial stability would be the first step. Instead, the anti-abortion movement in the US asks woman to become a mother, and completely self-sufficient financially at the same time. Mississippi has a high unemployment rate (9.1% compared to the national average of 7.8% across the US.) In some of the counties, the unemployment rate sits as high as 18.4% (source) Finding employment whilst pregnant is near impossible.  

For a woman with no financial security, remaining pregnant with no welfare to fall back on is astonishingly difficult. I'm so lucky that I will never have to make these kinds of decisions, but people do, and legislating abortion clinics into oblivion is irresponsible in my opinion. Instead, terminations in Mississippi and the other states (North Dakota, South Dakota and Arkansas) with only one remaining abortion clinic are actively trying to prevent safe, legal abortions are doing a disservice to woman. The rich will be able to afford to travel out of state, the most vulnerable will be forced to look for illegal, unregulated and unsafe options, or to have children they cannot care for and do not want.. 

The fact that these laws continually hit the poorest in society reeks of elitism, exactly the type of government right-wing citizens complain loudly about. Essentially, the right-wing in Mississippi is dictating the options for the most disenfranchised. Those with money and mobility are exempt. Injustice makes me angry. Injustice perpetrated by those with a 'righteous' agenda and sense of moral superiority angers me the most. The fact this has essentially been undertaken by stealth angers me the most. There has been no referendum or outright vote on banning abortions, which would be unconstitutional under Roe vs Wade. Instead, small changes to operating legislation have made it near impossible for clinics to operate. This is dishonest, plain and simple.  

I'm going to go and have a coffee to calm down, and be thankful I don't have to make these kind of decisions. I'd love to know what you think...


  1. This is indeed very sensitive. As someone who is struggling to have a baby I now believe every baby is a miracle. But it actually just proves how screwed up nature is, as if there was sense in all of this, people in really bad situations (I am thinking completely malnourished girls in underdeveloped countries, with no access to clean water etc.) would not get pregnant at all, and they do, all the time. Same goes for the "stress" card, if it was true that stress stops pregnancies, raped girls would not get pregnant ever, and they do.
    Which is why EDUCATION and access to birth control should be universal and free.
    But once the problem / accident pregnancy is there, there should be options that do not put the life of anyone in danger.
    People are going to perform abortions anyway, and if it is forbidden they will be done in unsanitary conditions, with sewing needles or God knows what... or using heavy medication without proper supervision. Like you point out it will be those who are the pooreset to pay for this.
    So yes, perhaps it should be regulated, it should be ensured that if you get an abortion you will get proper psychological care as well (I have had close acquaintances go through this and the emotional aftermath is not an easy thing), and also that you are not being forced into it. But yes the options have to be there because people will do it whether the government likes it or not, like they have done since the dawn of times and these days at least a clean place with proper medical (and emotional) supervision should be accesible.

  2. I think this is the hard bit to reconcile, isn't it. Another way in which fertility issues are so cripplingly unfair. And I agree that proper care and follow-up, physically and emotionally is essential.

    You're right, as long as there have been pregnancies, there have been unwanted ones. And its our responsibility to limit that through education and contraception. This is hugely problematic in the US as states like Mississippi only wish to teach abstinence-only, which maintains a cultural block over condom use. It's vicious circle.

    As you can probably guess, I could rant about this all day! So good to hear your views. x

  3. This makes me seriously angry too, it's not just you. xx

    1. So glad to hear I have company on this. I'm still livid about it! x


want to disagree? tell me I'm marvellous? Go 'write' ahead...